初创科技公司繁荣度和行业法规关系报告

发布时间:2022-06-27 16:20:03

下面是小编为大家整理的初创科技公司繁荣度和行业法规关系报告,供大家参考。

初创科技公司繁荣度和行业法规关系报告

 

 C ont ents

 Ex ecutiv e

 S ummary

  /

 i In tr oduc tion

  /

 1 Liter a tur e

 R e vie w and

 T heory

  /

 4 Da ta

  /

 8 V ariables

 and

 Empirical

 S tr a t egy

  /

 15 R esults

  /

 16 Discus sion

 and

 Implica tions

  /

 22 C onclusion

  /

 26 Appendix A

  /

 27 R ef er enc es

  /

 28 About the

 author s

 /

  32 A cknowledgmen ts

 /

  32 Publishing

 in f orma tion

 /

  33 Supporting

 the

 F r aser

 Ins titut e

 /

  34 Purpose ,

 funding,

 and

 independenc e

 /

  34 About the

 F r aser

 Ins titut e

 /

  35 E dit orial

 A dvisory

 Boar d

  /

  36

 fr aser ins titute . org

  Ex ecutiv e

 Summary

  En tr e pr ene urs hip

 ha s

 long

 b e en

 st udie d

 a s

 an

 im p or t an t

 de t erminan t

 f or t he

 long- t erm

 he alt h

 and

 g r ow t h

 of

 an

 ec onom y.

 Man y

 st udie s

 highlig h t how

 hig her

 le ve l s

 of

 gover nmen t

 r e g ul a tion

 c an

 im p e de

 bu sine ss

 ac tivity , fir m

 en tr y,

 and

 en tr e pr ene urs hip.

 O t hers

 ha ve

 s how n

 t ha t

 r e g ul a tion

 c an a ff ec t

 small bu sine ss e s

 t o

 a

 g r ea t er

 e x t en t

 t han

 me dium

 and

 l ar ge

 bu sine ss e s .

 The e x t ensive r e s e ar c h

 on

 t he

 r e l a tionship

 b e twe en

 r e g ul a tion

 and en tr e pr ene urs hip

 ha s

 ye t

 t o

 e xamine

 t he

 r e l a tionship

 b e twe en

 r e g ul a tion and

 young ,

 hig h-g r ow t h

 t ec hnolo g y

 star t up s .

 T ec hnolo g y

 star t up s

 and

 t ec hnolo g y

 en tr e pr ene urs

 ar e

 a t

 t he

 he ar t of

 innov a tion.

 The s e

 c om p anie s

 ar e

 unique

 in

 t ha t

 t he y

 do

 not

 fit

 ne a t ly in t o

 t he

 traditional

 ca t e gor ie s

 of

 small bu sine ss e s

 ( or

 small-

 and

 me dium- si ze d

 en t er pr i s e s)

 or

 l ar ge

 and

 e st a blis he d

 c om p anie s .

 Man y

 t ec hnolo g y star t up s

 ar e

 young

 and

 f a st -g r ow ing

 and

 t h u s

 of

 in t er e st

 f or

 t heir

 p ot enti al im p ac t

 on

 j ob

 c r ea tion.

 S t udie s

 ha ve

 f ound

 t ha t

 hig h-g r ow t h

 bu sine ss e s (whic h

 ar e

 di spr op or tionally

 young

 fir ms)

 acc oun t

 f or

 almo st

 50 per c en t

 of j ob

 c r ea tion

 in

 t he

 U nit e d

 S t a t e s .

 The r e l a tionship

 b e twe en

 r e g ul a tion

 and

 t ec hnolo g y

 star t up s

 ma y als o

 b e

 diff eren t

 t han

 t ha t

 b e twe en

 r e g ul a tion

 and

 a

 ty pic al

 small or

 l ar ge

 bu sine ss .

 This

 i s

 b eca u s e

 t ec hnolo g y

 star t up s

 t ha t

 g r ow quic k ly

 and

 b ec ome

 ―l ar ge‖

 ar e

 of t en

 mar k e t

 di sr upt ors

 or

 emer ge

 f r om

 undefine d,

 un- c le ar ,

 or

 r e g ul a t or y

 g ra y

 ar ea s .

 S ome

 t ec hnolo g y

 star t up s

 ha ve

 even

 b e en de s c r ibe d

 a s

 eng ag ing

 in

 ― r e g ul a t or y

 en tr e pr ene urs hip ‖

 b eca u s e

 t he y

 ar e in volve d

 in

 c hang ing

 r e g ul a tions

 by

 mobili z ing

 t heir

 c onsumer

 b a s e,

 and t he y

 op era t e

 despit e

 indu str y - sp ec ific

 r e g ul a tions .

 This

 st udy

 pr ov ide s

 a

 first

 lo ok

 a t

 t he

 r e l a tionship

 b e twe en

 r e g u - l a tion

 and

 t ec hnolo g y

 star t up s

 in

 t he

 U nit e d

 S t a t e s

 and

 in

 C anad a .

 I t e xamine s

 whe t her

 mor e

 r e g ul a t e d

 indu str ie s

 t end

 t o

 b e

 a ss o c i a t e d

 w it h f e wer

 star t up

 en tr ie s

 and

 mor e

 star t up

 de a t hs .

 The indu str ie s

 st udie d

 ar e: phar mac e utic al

 and

 me dicine

 man uf ac t ur ing;

 ambul a t or y

 he alt h

 c ar e

 s er - v ic e s ;

 sof tw ar e

 publi s hing

 indu str ie s ;

 d a t a

 pr o ce ssing ,

 ho sting ,

 and

 r e l a t e d s er v ic e s ;

 inf or ma tion

 s er v ic e s ;

 c r e dit

 in t er me di a tion

 and

 r e l a t e d

 ac tiv itie s ; s ec ur itie s ,

 c ommo dity

 c ontrac t s ,

 and

 ot her

 in ve stmen t s ;

 and

 insuranc e c ar r iers

 and

 r e l a t e d

 ac tiv itie s .

 This

 st udy

 include s

 16,672

 ac tive and

 2,913

 c lo s e d

 t ec hnolo g y

 star - t up s

 in

 t he

 U nit e d

 S t a t e s

 and

 C anad a

 t ha t

 wer e

 f ounded

 b e twe en

 J anuar y

  2012 and

 J une

 2019.

 Of

 t he

 t ot al

 19,585

 star t up s ,

 14,834

 ar e

 headqu ar t er e d in

 t he

 U nit e d

 S t a t e s

 and

 4,751

 in

 C anad a .

 The r e sult s

 sugge st

 t ha t

 mor e

 r e g ul a t e d

 indu str ie s

 ma y

 e xhibit

 lower ra t e s

 of

 en tr y

 and

 t ha t

 mor e

 r e g ul a t e d

 indu str ie s

 ar e

 a ss o c i a t e d

 w it h

 a g r ea t er

 lik e liho o d

 of

 a

 star t up

 c losing .

 The s e

 r e sult s

 ar e

 str onger

 f or

 t he U nit e d

 S t a t e s

 t han

 f or

 C anad a .

 This

 ma y

 b e

 b eca u s e

 t he

 st udy

 include s mor e

 US -b a s e d

 t han

 C anadi an-b a s e d

 star t up s .

 I t

 ma y

 als o

 b e

 t ha t

 t he r e g ul a t or y

 and/or

 mar k e t

 en v ir onmen t s

 diff er

 in

 t he

 US

 and

 C anad a

 suc h t ha t

 t he

 im p ac t

 of

 r e g ul a tion

 diff ers .

 F or

 inst anc e,

 t he

 C anadi an

 r e g ul a - tions

 ma y

 b e

 less

 r e le v an t

 f or

 C anadi an-b a s e d

 star t up s

 if

 t he

 go al

 i s

 t o e x pand

 t o

 t he

 r e l a tive ly

 l ar ger

 US

 mar k e t .

 Wh y

 would

 mor e

 r e g ul a tion

 le ad

 t o

 mor e

 star t up s

 c lo sing?

 S e veral st udie s

 ha ve

 f ound

 t ha t

 f ac t ors

 suc h

 a s

 hig her

 c o st s

 of

 r e g ul a t or y

 c om pli - anc e

 burden

 small c om p anie s

 mor e

 t han

 l ar ger

 and

 inc umben t

 c om p anie s . While

 c om pli anc e

 c o st

 i s

 one

 im p or t an t

 aven ue

 aff ec ting

 star t up

 c losing s , another

 p ot enti al

 aven ue

 i s

 t he

 a v ail a bility of

 in ve st or

 f unding .

 Ange l

 in ve st ors

 (ty pic ally

 e ar ly

 in ve st ors

 of

 a

 star t up)

 and

 institu - tional

 in ve st ors

 suc h

 a s

 ven t ur e

 ca pit ali st s

 pr ov ide

 f unding

 f or

 t ec hnolo g y star t up s

 in

 e x c hange

 f or

 e quity

 in

 t he

 star t up.

 V en t ur e

 ca pit ali st s

 ar e

 e s - p ec i ally

 im p or t an t

 onc e

 a

 star t up

 ha s

 e st a blis he d

 it s

 c onc e pt

 and

 i s

 r e ady f or

 t he

 g r ow t h

 st age.

 V en t ur e

 ca pit ali st s

 in ve st

 in

 star t up s

 w it h

 t he

 in t en t of

 ge t ting

 sig nific an t

 r e t ur ns

 in

 a

 s hor t

 time.

 M or e

 sp ec ifically ,

 t he

 go al

 of ven t ur e

 f und s

 i s

 t o

 ac hie ve

 r e t ur ns

 in

 t he

 or der

 of

 20 per c en t

 or

 mor e

 per ye ar

 w ithin

 a

 10- ye ar

 per io d.

 B eca u s e

 of

 t hi s ,

 t he y

 ar e

 s ee k ing

 t o

 finance c om p anie s

 t ha t

 ha ve

 s hor t er

 time

 hor i zons

 and

 g r ea t er

 ca pit al

 effic ienc y. Sinc e

 he a v ier

 r e g ul a tions

 add

 a

 l a yer of

 bur ea ucrac y,

 inc r ea s e

 ca pit al

 r e - quir emen t s ,

 and

 leng t hen

 t he

 time

 hor i zon

 of

 in ve stmen t

 r e t ur ns ,

 star t up s in

 mor e

 r e g ul a t e d

 indu str ie s

 c ould

 a t trac t

 less

 ven t ur e

 ca pit al

 f unding .

 This

 st udy

 di s c u ss e s

 t hi s

 aven ue

 and

 p oin t s

 t o

 s ome

 pr e liminar y

 e v idenc e sugge sting

 t ha t

 s ome

 ven t ur e

 ca pit al

 in ve st ors

 ar e

 de t er r e d

 f r om

 in ve sting in

 star t up s

 in

 mor e

 r e g ul a t e d

 indu str ie s .

  Intr oduction

  En tr e pr ene urs hip

 ha s

 long

 b e en

 st udie d

 a s

 an

 im p or t an t

 de t erminan t

 f or long-r un

 ec onomic

 g r ow t h.

 A s

 such,

 s c hol ars

 f ollow v ar iou s

 me a sur e s

 of en tr e pr ene ur i al

 ac tivity and

 analyze c r o ss -c oun tr y

 diff er enc e s

 and

 tr end s in

 en tr e pr ene ur i al

 ac tivity over

 time.

 M uc h

 of

 t hi s

 r e s e ar c h

 i s

 als o

 dir ec t e d t ow ard

 underst anding

 how

 t o

 enc ourage

 and

 spur

 en tr e pr ene urs hip

 and de t er mining

 wha t

 c onditions

 c an

 burden

 en tr e pr ene urs .

 The instit utional en v ir onmen t

 ha s

 b e en

 iden tifie d

 a s

 ha v ing

 an

 im p ac t

 on

 t he

 e x t en t

 of

 pr o - duc tive en tr e pr ene ur i al

 ac tivity (B a umol,

 1990;

 B o e tt k e

 and

 Coy ne,

 2009; L ande s ,

 M ok y r ,

 and

 B a umol,

 2012).

 M or e

 sp ec ifically ,

 t he

 r e g ul a tion

 of

 bu sine ss

 ac tivity and

 en tr y

 ha s b e en

 on

 t he

 f or ef r on t

 of

 t hi s

 r e s e ar c h,

 and

 em pir ical

 st udie s

 indic a t e t ha t

 hig her

 le ve l s

 of

 r e g ul a tions

 im p e de

 bu sine ss

 ac tivity ,

 fir m

 en tr y,

 and

 en tr e pr ene urs hip

 (Kl a pper ,

 L ae ven, and

 R a jan, 2006;

 Ny str öm,

 2008;

 Br ipi, 2013;

 L ima

 e t

 al.,

 2014;

 Branse tt er

 e t

 al.,

 2014).

 The s e

 r e s e ar c h

 p a p ers

 ha ve f o c u s e d

 on

 agg r e g a t e

 ―bu sine ss

 en tr y ‖

 or

 en tr e pr ene urs hip—of t en

 e qu a t - ing

 all

 small-

 and

 me dium- si ze d

 bu sine ss e s ,

 l ar ge

 e st a blis he d

 bu sine ss e s , and

 ―hig h-g r ow t h ‖

 t ec hnolo g y

 star t up s

 in

 t he

 same

 ca t e gor y.

 While

 sub s e - quen t

 r e s e ar c h

 ha s

 demonstra t e d

 t he

 diff erenti al

 im p ac t

 of

 r e g ul a tion

 on small bu sine ss e s

 (s ee

 C alc ag no

 and

 S ob e l,

 2013;

 B aile y

 and

 Thoma s ,

 2017; C hamb ers ,

 2018),

 t her e

 ha s

 b e en

 lit t le

 r e s e ar c h

 e xamining

 t he

 r e l a tionship b e twe en

 r e g ul a tion

 and

 young ,

 hig h-g r ow t h

 t ec hnolo g y

 star t up s .

 W e

 fill t hi s

 g a p

 by

 st udying

 t ha t

 r e l a tions hip.

 T ec hnolo g y

 star t up s

 ar e

 unique

 in

 t ha t

 t he y

 neither

 fit

 ne a t ly

 in t o

 t he

 traditional

 ca t e gor i z a tions

 of

 small bu sine ss e s

 ( or

 small-

 and

 me dium- si ze d

 en t er pr i s e s)

 or

 in t o

 l ar ge

 and

 e st a blis he d

 c om p anie s .

 The y

 ar e

 simi - l ar

 t o

 traditional

 small bu sine ss e s

 b eca u s e

 t he y

 t end

 t o

 b e

 ― small ‖

 in

 si ze, but

 t he y

 diff er

 in

 man y

 ot her

 w a y s —mo st

 im p or t an t ly ,

 t ec hnolo g y

 star t up s t end

 t o

 b e

 hig h

 g r ow t h

 and

 innov a tion

 f o c u s ed,

 and

 r emain

 small f or

 less

 t han

 10 ye ars .

 On

 t he

 ot her

 hand,

 ― small bu sine ss e s‖

 t end

 t o

 r emain small f or

 mo st

 of

 t heir

 e xi st enc e

 and

 ar e

 not

 innov a tion

 or

 g r ow t h

 f o c u s e d (H urst

 and

 Pug sle y,

 2011).

 The s e

 small bu sine ss e s

 ar e

 of t en

 r ef er r e d

 t o

 a s ― mom-and-p op...

推荐访问:初创科技公司繁荣度和行业法规关系报告 初创 繁荣 关系

版权所有:众一秘书网 2005-2024 未经授权禁止复制或建立镜像[众一秘书网]所有资源完全免费共享

Powered by 众一秘书网 © All Rights Reserved.。备案号: 辽ICP备05005627号-1